English · livello B2. Leggi il testo in inglese e allena la comprensione. Il video con audio e sottotitoli sincronizzati è in arrivo sul canale YouTube.
The United States Senate has voted in favour of a non-binding measure that would limit the President's ability to take military action against Iran without Congressional approval. The vote, which came after House approval followed the President's recent strikes on Iranian targets, represents a symbolic rebuke from the legislative branch.
The resolution would require the Trump administration to remove US armed forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorised by Congress. Although the measure is non-binding — meaning the President can ignore it — its passage signals growing unease in Washington about the direction of policy in the Middle East.
Three progressive senators from New York City, joined by several Republicans, broke with the President to support the resolution. Among the most vocal critics was Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia who has long argued that the Constitution gives Congress, not the President, the power to declare war.
The debate goes far beyond Iran. It touches one of the oldest tensions in American constitutional history: who has the authority to take the country to war? Successive presidents from both parties have stretched the limits of executive power. This vote suggests Congress is once again trying to reassert itself.
To rebuke — to express strong disapproval. Non-binding — without legal force. Hostilities — acts of war. To curb — to limit or restrain. Bipartisan — involving both major parties. To reassert — to claim again with force.
Should the power to declare war belong to the President or to Congress? What is the value of a non-binding resolution if it cannot be enforced?
Suggerimento: leggi il brano una prima volta senza fermarti, poi una seconda volta ad alta voce insieme al video. Ripetere ad alta voce è il modo più veloce per fissare pronuncia e vocaboli.